Template talk:Group Infobox: Difference between revisions
From Little Tail Wiki
Latest comment: Sunday at 16:20 by BlurryDawgo in topic Small suggestion: I feel like "industry" should be swapped with "type"
BlurryDawgo (talk | contribs) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::*(valid "industries", I mean) [[User:BlurryDawgo|BlurryDawgo]] ([[User talk:BlurryDawgo|talk]]) 16:01, 16 March 2025 (EDT) | ::*(valid "industries", I mean) [[User:BlurryDawgo|BlurryDawgo]] ([[User talk:BlurryDawgo|talk]]) 16:01, 16 March 2025 (EDT) | ||
::*:What? [[User:Zoltier|Zoltier]] ([[User talk:Zoltier|talk]]) 16:05, 16 March 2025 (EDT) | ::*:What? [[User:Zoltier|Zoltier]] ([[User talk:Zoltier|talk]]) 16:05, 16 March 2025 (EDT) | ||
::*::A reply got eaten, sorry. What I meant to say was if things like "military unit", "royal dynasty" or "terrorist group" could be considered "industries" in the context of the navbox; they're not actual ''industries'' but they explain what the group is involved in. [[User:BlurryDawgo|BlurryDawgo]] ([[User talk:BlurryDawgo|talk]]) 16:11, 16 March 2025 (EDT) | |||
::*:::Then don't use the industry field in those contexts. I already said infobox fields are optional. [[User:Zoltier|Zoltier]] ([[User talk:Zoltier|talk]]) 16:15, 16 March 2025 (EDT) | |||
::*::::Got it. I was just bringing this up because another wiki used "type". | |||
::*::::You're right, we don't need to worry about it. Shutting up. [[User:BlurryDawgo|BlurryDawgo]] ([[User talk:BlurryDawgo|talk]]) 16:20, 16 March 2025 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:20, 16 March 2025
Small suggestion: I feel like "industry" should be swapped with "type"
I feel it allows for more versatility. Unless "industry" is just the parameter and what the template actually says is different. BlurryDawgo (talk) 15:51, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- Industry describes what an organization is primarily involved in, and not every parameter needs to be used on any given group page. Zoltier (talk) 15:56, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- (valid "industries", I mean) BlurryDawgo (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- What? Zoltier (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- A reply got eaten, sorry. What I meant to say was if things like "military unit", "royal dynasty" or "terrorist group" could be considered "industries" in the context of the navbox; they're not actual industries but they explain what the group is involved in. BlurryDawgo (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- Then don't use the industry field in those contexts. I already said infobox fields are optional. Zoltier (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- Got it. I was just bringing this up because another wiki used "type".
- You're right, we don't need to worry about it. Shutting up. BlurryDawgo (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- Then don't use the industry field in those contexts. I already said infobox fields are optional. Zoltier (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- A reply got eaten, sorry. What I meant to say was if things like "military unit", "royal dynasty" or "terrorist group" could be considered "industries" in the context of the navbox; they're not actual industries but they explain what the group is involved in. BlurryDawgo (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- What? Zoltier (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2025 (EDT)
- (valid "industries", I mean) BlurryDawgo (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2025 (EDT)